Top persons sorted by score
(Another of the Prime Pages' resources)
The Largest Known Primes Icon
  View this page in:   language help
The Prover-Account Top 20
Persons by: number score normalized score
Programs by: number score normalized score
Projects by: number score normalized score

At this site we keep several lists of primes, most notably the list of the 5,000 largest known primes. Who found the most of these record primes? We keep separate counts for persons, projects and programs. To see these lists click on 'number' to the right.

Clearly one 100,000,000 digit prime is much harder to discover than quite a few 100,000 digit primes. Based on the usual estimates we score the top persons, provers and projects by adding ‎(log n)3 log log n‎ for each of their primes n. Click on 'score' to see these lists.

Finally, to make sense of the score values, we normalize them by dividing by the current score of the 5000th prime. See these by clicking on 'normalized score' in the table on the right.

41 Walter Darimont 2 49.1458
42 Randy Ready 13 49.1180
43 Denis Iakovlev 1 48.9974
44 Senji Yamashita 31.3333 48.9765
45 Martin Vanc 1 48.9657
46 Michael Herder 1 48.9335
47 Sturle Sunde 1 48.9324
48 Nayan Hajratwala 1 48.9067
49 Brook Harste 10 48.8905
50 Ralf Terber 2 48.8886
51 Frank Meador 2 48.8415
52 Magnus Bergman 1 48.7753
53 Lennart Vogel 77 48.7382
54 Mariusz Szafrański 42 48.7050
55 Scott Gilvey 2 48.6840
56 Vladimir Volynsky 1 48.6527
57 Dennis R. Gesker 1 48.6097
58 Douglas B. McKay 85 48.5548
59 James P. Burt 87 48.5531
60 Wolfgang Schwieger 7 48.5145

move up list ^
move down list v


Score for Primes

To find the score for a person, program or project's primes, we give each prime n the score (log n)3 log log n; and then find the sum of the scores of their primes. For persons (and for projects), if three go together to find the prime, each gets one-third of the score. Finally we take the log of the resulting sum to narrow the range of the resulting scores. (Throughout this page log is the natural logarithm.)

How did we settle on (log n)3 log log n? For most of the primes on the list the primality testing algorithms take roughly O(log(n)) steps where the steps each take a set number of multiplications. FFT multiplications take about

O( log n . log log n . log log log n )
operations. However, for practical purposes the O(log log log n) is a constant for this range number (it is the precision of numbers used during the FFT, 64 bits suffices for numbers under about 2,000,000 digits).

Next, by the prime number theorem, the number of integers we must test before finding a prime the size of n is O(log n) (only the constant is effected by prescreening using trial division).  So to get a rough estimate of the amount of time to find a prime the size of n, we just multiply these together and we get

O( (log n)3 log log n ).
Finally, for convenience when we add these scores, we take the log of the result.  This is because log n is roughly 2.3 times the number of digits in the prime n, so (log n)3 is quite large for many of the primes on the list. (The number of decimal digits in n is floor((log n)/(log 10)+1)).