Top persons sorted by score (Another of the Prime Pages' resources)

The Prover-Account Top 20
Persons by: number score normalized score
Programs by: number score normalized score
Projects by: number score normalized score

At this site we keep several lists of primes, most notably the list of the 5,000 largest known primes. Who found the most of these record primes? We keep separate counts for persons, projects and programs. To see these lists click on 'number' to the right.

Clearly one 100,000,000 digit prime is much harder to discover than quite a few 100,000 digit primes. Based on the usual estimates we score the top persons, provers and projects by adding ‎(log n)3 log log n‎ for each of their primes n. Click on 'score' to see these lists.

Finally, to make sense of the score values, we normalize them by dividing by the current score of the 5000th prime. See these by clicking on 'normalized score' in the table on the right.

rank person primes score 432 Anders Åström 3 44.5758 433 Zhiyuan Zhan 2 44.5745 434 Jan Koval 3 44.5704 435 Guillaume Jamet 3 44.5626 436 Vince Splain 2 44.5577 437 Josef Matousek 3 44.5523 438 Renato Chagas 3 44.5495 439 Peter Doggart 1 44.5483 440 John Williams 3 44.5394 441 Aaron Everett 3 44.5383 442 Luis DeJesus 1 44.5302 443 Andy Penrose 2 44.5291 444 Mikhail Karevik 1 44.5214 445 Eric Pozharski 2 44.5022 446 Rickard Rehnberg 1 44.5008 447 John Longden 2 44.5005 448 SeungChul Ahn 2 44.4977 449 Art Charette 2 44.4819 450 Rune Fredriksen 3 44.4639 451 Bogdan F. Horotan 1 44.4577

move up list
move down list

#### Notes:

Score for Primes

To find the score for a person, program or project's primes, we give each prime n the score (log n)3 log log n; and then find the sum of the scores of their primes. For persons (and for projects), if three go together to find the prime, each gets one-third of the score. Finally we take the log of the resulting sum to narrow the range of the resulting scores. (Throughout this page log is the natural logarithm.)

How did we settle on (log n)3 log log n? For most of the primes on the list the primality testing algorithms take roughly O(log(n)) steps where the steps each take a set number of multiplications. FFT multiplications take about

O( log n . log log n . log log log n )
operations. However, for practical purposes the O(log log log n) is a constant for this range number (it is the precision of numbers used during the FFT, 64 bits suffices for numbers under about 2,000,000 digits).

Next, by the prime number theorem, the number of integers we must test before finding a prime the size of n is O(log n) (only the constant is effected by prescreening using trial division).  So to get a rough estimate of the amount of time to find a prime the size of n, we just multiply these together and we get

O( (log n)3 log log n ).
Finally, for convenience when we add these scores, we take the log of the result.  This is because log n is roughly 2.3 times the number of digits in the prime n, so (log n)3 is quite large for many of the primes on the list. (The number of decimal digits in n is floor((log n)/(log 10)+1)).