Top persons sorted by score (Another of the Prime Pages' resources)
View this page in:

The Prover-Account Top 20
Persons by: number score normalized score
Programs by: number score normalized score
Projects by: number score normalized score

At this site we keep several lists of primes, most notably the list of the 5,000 largest known primes. Who found the most of these record primes? We keep separate counts for persons, projects and programs. To see these lists click on 'number' to the right.

Clearly one 100,000,000 digit prime is much harder to discover than quite a few 100,000 digit primes. Based on the usual estimates we score the top persons, provers and projects by adding ‎(log n)3 log log n‎ for each of their primes n. Click on 'score' to see these lists.

Finally, to make sense of the score values, we normalize them by dividing by the current score of the 5000th prime. See these by clicking on 'normalized score' in the table on the right.

rank person primes score 435 Samy Bourghol 3 44.6219 436 Michal Tatárka 2 44.6105 437 Klaus Olszowi 3 44.6087 438 Guillaume Tardy 3 44.5933 439 Bo Tornberg 9 44.5889 440 Mike Lane 2 44.5813 441 Thierry Fausten 1 44.5811 442 Kevin Woerner 1 44.5797 443 Anders Åström 3 44.5758 444 Zhiyuan Zhan 2 44.5745 445 Jan Koval 3 44.5704 446 Peter Leschek 2 44.5682 447 Guillaume Jamet 3 44.5626 448 Vince Splain 2 44.5577 449 Josef Matousek 3 44.5523 450 Renato Chagas 3 44.5495 451 Peter Doggart 1 44.5483 452 John Williams 3 44.5394 453 Aaron Everett 3 44.5383 454 Luis DeJesus 1 44.5302

move up list
move down list

#### Notes:

Score for Primes

To find the score for a person, program or project's primes, we give each prime n the score (log n)3 log log n; and then find the sum of the scores of their primes. For persons (and for projects), if three go together to find the prime, each gets one-third of the score. Finally we take the log of the resulting sum to narrow the range of the resulting scores. (Throughout this page log is the natural logarithm.)

How did we settle on (log n)3 log log n? For most of the primes on the list the primality testing algorithms take roughly O(log(n)) steps where the steps each take a set number of multiplications. FFT multiplications take about

O( log n . log log n . log log log n )
operations. However, for practical purposes the O(log log log n) is a constant for this range number (it is the precision of numbers used during the FFT, 64 bits suffices for numbers under about 2,000,000 digits).

Next, by the prime number theorem, the number of integers we must test before finding a prime the size of n is O(log n) (only the constant is effected by prescreening using trial division).  So to get a rough estimate of the amount of time to find a prime the size of n, we just multiply these together and we get

O( (log n)3 log log n ).
Finally, for convenience when we add these scores, we take the log of the result.  This is because log n is roughly 2.3 times the number of digits in the prime n, so (log n)3 is quite large for many of the primes on the list. (The number of decimal digits in n is floor((log n)/(log 10)+1)).