>>> (Maintenance postponed) New web page format problems? suggestions?
659 · 23327371 + 1
|Description:||659 · 23327371 + 1|
|Verification status (*):||Proven|
|Official Comment (*):||[none]|
|Unofficial Comments:||This prime has 1 user comment below.|
|Proof-code(s): (*):||L3502 : Ristic, PSieve, Srsieve, PrimeGrid, LLR|
|Decimal Digits:||1001642 (log10 is 1001641.29658787)|
|Rank (*):||672 (digit rank is 1)|
|Entrance Rank (*):||196|
|Currently on list? (*):||short|
|Submitted:||11/4/2016 12:44:00 CDT|
|Last modified:||11/4/2016 14:20:36 CDT|
|Score (*):||46.638 (normalized score 11.5221)|
User comments about this prime (disclaimer):
User comments are allowed to convey mathematical information about this number, how it was proven prime.... See our guidelines and restrictions.
The Top 5000 Primes is a list for proven primes only. In order to maintain the integrity of this list, we seek to verify the primality of all submissions. We are currently unable to check all proofs (ECPP, KP, ...), but we will at least trial divide and PRP check every entry before it is included in the list.
field value prime_id 122468 person_id 9 machine Using: Xeon 4c+4c 3.5GHz what prime notes Command: /home/caldwell/client/pfgw/pfgw64 -t -q"659*2^3327371+1" 2>&1 PFGW Version 220.127.116.11BIT.20130722.x86_Dev [GWNUM 27.11] Primality testing 659*2^3327371+1 [N-1, Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfridge] Running N-1 test using base 3 Calling Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfridge with factored part 100.00% 659*2^3327371+1 is prime! (4865.4910s+0.0012s) [Elapsed time: 81.08 minutes] modified 2020-07-07 17:30:16 created 2016-11-04 12:51:01 id 168108
Query times: 0.0002 seconds to select prime, 0.0003 seconds to seek comments.
Printed from the PrimePages <primes.utm.edu> © Chris Caldwell.