Glossary:
Prime Pages:
Top 5000:

Pierre de Fermat wrote to Marin Mersenne on December 25, 1640 that:
If I can determine the basic reason why
3, 5, 17, 257, 65 537, ...,
are prime numbers, I feel that I would find very interesting results,
for I have already found marvelous things [along these lines] which I
will tell you about later. [Archibald1914].
This is usually taken to be the conjecture that every number of the form is prime. So we call these the Fermat numbers, and when a number of this form is prime, we call it a Fermat prime.
The only known Fermat primes are the first five Fermat numbers: F_{0}=3, F_{1}=5, F_{2}=17, F_{3}=257, and F_{4}=65537. A simple heuristic shows
that it is likely that these are the only Fermat primes (though many folks like Eisenstein thought otherwise).
In 1732 Euler discovered 641 divides F_{5}. It only takes two trial divisions to find this factor because Euler showed that every divisor of a Fermat number F_{n} with n greater than 2 has the form k^{.}2^{n+2}+1. In the case of F_{5} this is 128k+1, so we would try 257 and 641 (129, 385, and 513 are not prime). Now we know that all of the Fermat numbers are composite for the other n less than 31. The quickest way to check a Fermat number for primality (if trial division fails to find a small factor) is to use Pepin's test.
Gauss proved that a regular polygon of n sides
can be inscribed in a circle with Euclidean methods (e.g.,
by straightedge and compass) if and only if n is a
power of two times a product of distinct Fermat primes.
The Fermat numbers are pairwise relatively prime, as can be seen in the following identity:
F_{0}F_{1}F_{2}^{.}...^{.}F_{n1}
+2 = F_{n}.
(This gives a simple proof that there are infinitely
many primes.)
The quickest way to find out if a Fermat number is prime, is to use Pepin's test [Pepin77]. It is not yet known if
there are infinitely many Fermat primes, but it seems
likely that there are not.
The book [KLS2001] is an excellent source of information on these numbers.
See Also: PepinsTest, Heuristic, PierpontPrime References:
 Archibald1914
 R. C. Archibald, "Remarks on Klien's `Famous problems of elementary geometry'," Amer. Math. Monthly, 21 (1914) 247259.
 Carmichael19
 R. D. Carmichael, "Fermat numbers F_{n} = 2^{2n} + 1," Amer. Math. Monthly, 26 (1919) 137146.
 CDNY95
 R. Crandall, J. Doenias, C. Norrie and J. Young, "The twentysecond Fermat number is composite," Math. Comp., 64 (1995) 863868. MR 95f:11104
 CMP2003
 R. E. Crandall, E. W. Mayer and J. S. Papadopoulos, "The twentyfourth Fermat number is composite," Math. Comp., 72 (2003) 15551572. (Abstract available)
 Gostin95
 G. B. Gostin, "New factors of Fermat numbers," Math. Comp., 64 (1995) 393395. MR 95c:11151
 HB1975
 J. C. Hallyburton, Jr. and J. Brillhart, "Two new factors of Fermat numbers," Math. Comp., 29 (1975) 109112. Collection of articles dedicated to Derrick Henry Lehmer on the occasion of his seventieth birthday. MR 51:5460
 HS61
 A. Hurwitz and J. L. Selfridge, "Fermat numbers and perfect numbers," Notices Amer. Math. Soc., 8 (1961) 601. Abstract 587104.
 Keller83
 W. Keller, "Factors of Fermat numbers and large primes of the form k· 2^{n} +1," Math. Comp., 41 (1983) 661673. MR 85b:11117
 Keller92
 W. Keller, "Factors of Fermat numbers and large primes of the form k· 2^{n} + 1 ii," Hamburg, (September 1992) Manuscript.
 KLS2001
 M. Krízek, F. Luca and L. Somer, 17 lectures on Fermat numbers: from number theory to geometry, CMS Books in Mathematics Vol, 9, SpringerVerlag, New York, NY, 2001. pp. xvii + 257, ISBN 0387953329. MR 2002i:11001
 LLMP93
 A. K. Lenstra, Lenstra, Jr., H. W., M. S. Manasse and J. M. Pollard, "The factorization of the ninth Fermat number," Math. Comp., 61 (1993) 319349. Addendum, Math. Comp. 64 (1995), 1357. MR 1 303 085
 Pepin77
 T. Pepin, "Sur la formule 2^{2n}+1," C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 85 (1877) 329331.
 Robinson54
 R. M. Robinson, "Mersenne and Fermat numbers," Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 5 (1954) 842846. [Announces the discovery of the 13th through 17th Mersenne primesthe first Mersenne primes found by electronic computer.]
 Robinson57
 R. M. Robinson, "Factors of Fermat numbers," Math. Tables Aids Comput., 11 (1957) 2122.
 Robinson58
 R. M. Robinson, "A report on primes of the form k· 2^{n} + 1 and on factors of Fermat numbers," Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 9 (1958) 673681. MR 20:3097
 Selfridge53
 J. L. Selfridge, "Factors of Fermat numbers," Math. Tables Aids Comput., 7 (1953) 274275.
 Shippee1978
 D. E. Shippee, "Four new factors of Fermat numbers," Math. Comp., 32:143 (1978) 941. (Abstract available)
 SS1981
 Shorey, T. N. and Stewart, C. L., "On divisors of Fermat, Fibonacci, Lucas and Lehmer numbers. II," J. London Math. Soc. (2), 23:1 (1981) 1723. MR 82m:10025
 Stewart1977
 C. L. Stewart, "On divisors of Fermat, Fibonacci, Lucas and Lehmer numbers," Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., 35:3 (1977) 425447. MR 58:10694
 Stewart1983
 Stewart, C. L., "On divisors of Fermat, Fibonacci, Lucas and Lehmer numbers. III," J. London Math. Soc. (2), 28:2 (1983) 211217. MR 85g:11021
 Stewart1983
 Stewart, C. L., "On divisors of Fermat, Fibonacci, Lucas and Lehmer numbers. III," J. London Math. Soc. (2), 28:2 (1983) 211217. MR 85g:11021
 Wrathall64
 C. P. Wrathall, "New factors of Fermat numbers," Math. Comp., 18 (1964) 324325. MR 29:1167
 YB88
 J. Young and D. A. Buell, "The twentieth Fermat number is composite," Math. Comp., 50 (1988) 261263. MR 89b:11012
 Young98
 J. Young, "Large primes and Fermat factors," Math. Comp., 67:244 (1998) 17351738. MR 99a:11010
Abstract:
A systematic search for large primes has yielded the largest Fermat factors known.
